The EPA weakened emissions standards for new power plants and said it would no longer consider the economic impacts of public health in rule making.

The EPA won't consider the economic costs of harms to human health, at least for now. Legal and health experts are concerned ...

The nation’s largest lobbying arm of the oil and gas industry is calling on Congress to shield companies from a growing ...

“Under Lee Zeldin, anti-pollution enforcement is dying a quick death,” remarked PEER Executive Director Tim Whitehouse, ...

The agency's new math to favor polluters, explained.

IDEM Commissioner Clint Woods spoke at a recent hearing about the Clean Air Act at the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The head of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management said ...

The high court's decision is a win for insurers, with it saying that standard commercial liability policies cannot cover lawsuits alleging injury from environmental pollution, and said it was ...

Rising ocean temperatures have been implicated in mass coral bleaching events affecting the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). These ...

Shelley, with Public Citizen, believes the PM2.5 rule would have delivered the greatest health benefit of any EPA regulation ...

Water pollution from synthetic chemicals needs NC regulations with more teeth than what state board proposes, environmental ...