The membership of the University IRB is sufficiently diverse to allow compliant review of the types of research in which University/Affiliate investigators commonly engage including social behavioral, ...

Peer review is often the key hurdle between obtaining some data and getting it published in the scientific literature. As such, it’s often essential to keeping questionable results out of the ...

S ay your department gets a green light to bring in an outside expert — typically, an academic in the discipline — to do a comprehensive evaluation of your program. How does the department decide who ...

As part of its overall strategy to strengthen audit quality, in 2014 the AICPA issued the discussion paper Enhancing Audit Quality: Plans and Perspectives for the U.S. CPA Profession, which provides a ...

You have /3 articles left. Sign up for a free account or log in. Is your area up for outside evaluation? In higher education, we typically know these as external ...

We strive to innovate in our peer-review process, to improve its efficacy, quality and transparency. We are constantly monitoring and reviewing our efforts to address more closely the needs of the ...

“Greetings! You’ve been added to our journal’s editorial system because we believe you would serve as an excellent reviewer of [Unexciting Title] manuscript …” You probably get these, too. It feels ...

made a significant and positive contribution to the peer review process, regardless of whether the paper was eventually accepted by the journal; taken both a broad and detailed view of the paper; ...